As a country with a large digital economy, China also actively participated in and led the global governance of digital economy in recent years. So far, China has negotiated and signed several international economic and trade agreements containing designated chapters and relevant rules on e-commerce, including China-Australia Free Trade Agreement, China-Korea Free Trade Agreement, and China-Mauritius Free Trade Agreement, etc. These agreements provides for the rights and obligations of the parties in many realms of digital governance such as the regulatory framework for e-commerce, electronic authentication and digital certificates, online consumer protection, online data and personal information protection, paperless trading, and e-commerce cooperation, reflecting China's key concerns and basic approach in the aspect of international rules on digital economy.
Compared with the aforementioned bilateral agreements, the RCEP, signed by China on November 15, 2020 and effective on January 1, 2022, covers a greater range of cutting-edge topics in digital economy and e-commerce, such as the free cross-border flow of data subject to public policies and national security concerns, and not non-localization of computing facilities as a matter of principle. As reflected through the conclusion and entry into force of the RCEP, China has taken further important steps in exploring and experimenting in respect of making international rules for digital economy governance.
However, significant differences still remain between the rules of digital economy in the international economic and trade agreements already concluded by China and other international agreements that China plans to accede to, such as DEPA and CPTPP. Specifically, the rules on digital economy in the existing agreements concluded by China usually focus on the topics closely related to traditional trade in goods and services, such as e-commerce facilitation and consumer protection, rather than issues relating to "pure" digital economy, such as cross-border data flow, location of computing facilities, cryptographic products and source codes. To the extent that the issues such as the cross-border data flow and non-localization of computing facilities are addressed in certain agreements, such rules tend to only set out basic principles without stipulating enforceable rules, leaving significant room to the contracting parties' discretion.
As a result of these differences, during the process of accession to the CPTPP and DEPA, China may face greater challenges in aligning with the stricter disciplines in these agreements on the cross-border data flow, non-discriminatory treatment of digital products, localization of computing facilities, etc. Negotiators and policymakers need to balance security and efficiency, taking into account the interests of regulators, businesses and consumers, in order to achieve the objective of promoting the healthy and orderly development of the digital economy jointly with other countries.