On September 10, 2025, the Beijing Internet Court held a press conference on the trial of AI-related cases and released eight typical cases of AI-related disputes:
(1) Case 1: Content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) may be recognized as a "work" if it meets the requirements of "intellectual achievement" and "originality". The ownership of copyright shall be determined based on the original intellectual contributions made by entities such as users and developers to the generated content.
(2) Case 2: AI-synthesized voices are protected if they are identifiable. Even if the original audio recording is legally licensed, the commercial use of its AI-synthesized version without consent still constitutes infringement.
(3) Case 3: For the commercial use of AI voices, the elements for determining infringement are "identifiability + commercial use". In scenarios where e-commerce merchants entrust third parties to conduct promotions and AI-synthesized celebrity voices are used for product marketing, merchants who fail to fulfill their review obligations shall bear joint liability with the promoters.
(4) Case 4: If an AI face-swap makes the original subject unrecognizable, it does not constitute portrait right infringement; however, using video containing facial information for AI synthesis without consent infringes on personal information rights and interests.
(5) Case 5: If a platform’s algorithm misjudges AI-generated content and mutes the user, and fails to fulfill its obligation to explain the algorithmic decision, the platform shall bear liability for breach of contract.
(6) Case 6: Maliciously distorting and defaming others’ portraits via AI and disseminating the result constitutes infringement of portrait rights, reputation rights, and general personality rights simultaneously.
(7) Case 7: If the image of a virtual digital human reflects the unique aesthetic choices of the production team, it constitutes a work of fine art and is protected by the Copyright Law.
(8) Case 8: If a platform encourages users to create AI companion images of celebrities through algorithms, this constitutes infringement of the right to name, portrait right, and general personality right.
For more information, please click here.
Source: Beijing Internet Court