点击上方“图灵人工智能”，选择“星标”公众号
您想知道的人工智能干货，第一时间送达
版权声明
打开ChatGPT发现，新版已经支持推理功能了，或许是针对DeepSeek不得已而为之吧。我迫不及待地想一试究竟，看看ChatGPT的推理能力如何。
下列文字是本人在笔记本上写的几段话，里面的单词、语法和逻辑都没有做任何的修饰，完全是键盘裸敲的。所以，输入的文字并不是一个理想的提示语句。但就是在这样的情况下，我们就这个提示符和文字分别输入至DeepSeek和ChatGPT，分别看看二者的表现如何。
这里要说明一下，提示符和文字的场景是一位博士即将参加答辩会，为了准备这场答辩，在咖啡吧里随手敲的一些类似头脑风暴的文字。考虑到答辩展示和过程主要用英语完成，所以这里的提示符和文字都是以英文方式输入：提示符：“I'm just make some notes for the preparation for the phd thesis viva voce, as following, pls read and understand, then show me any suggestion based on what I noted in order to make a good preparation for viva voce, thanks!”键盘裸敲的文字："Start organize the literatures of the thesis to recall the structure and the clue of the whole thesis.
One way is to go through the thesis, identify the literatures, copy/paste the sentence of each cited literature, map the literature in the thesis into the literature management tool Zotero, based on the main outline, so that each cited literature in the thesis has the corresponding mapping relationship to the one in Zotero.
However, why we need to do this work, for one thing, is to read through the thesis to see if there is any issue over the whole process, the second is to create the mapping table on the cited manuscripts between those in the thesis and Zotero, but the most important thing is, we need take the advantage of this work, to make notes along with the logic of the thesis, and write down or present the notes in the representative way in slide with the caption notes, in order to update the final slide show, and be prepared for the viva voce.
So, we can go on with the current work, but to add another work in para, that is the current PPT slide, go through the thesis, make the logic smooth, while update the slide with needed literatures.
Thus, open two materials, one is phd thesis, and one is the slide, in para, read, understand, and clear the logic of the thesis, while update the slide, with the concrete literatures, that would be the good way to prepare the materials need for viva voce, including the slide and the main captions needed for presentation and defense.
"
二. 分别在DeepSeek和ChatGPT中输入提示符和文字
三. DeepSeek和ChatGPT的思考过程展现实际上从下面的思考过程的输出，可以很容易地看到，DeepSeek在全面性、逻辑性和细节性上面，完爆ChatGPT。尤其是仔细阅读一遍发现，DeepSeek的思考过程很容易启发新的思考，比如为何要用Zotero而不是其他文献管理工具，为什么要Slide和论文并行走等等，非常具体。而ChatGPT的思考过程，似乎不断的在很General的层面来回确认，没有展现具体而深入的思考过程。此外，令人意外的一点是，两者都是全英文输入，DeepSeek的输出都是英文，但ChatGPT的输出竟然变成中文了。我又在检查了一遍输入的英文，并没有任何提示说输出的内容需要以中文的方式，这点很是疑惑，或许是因为其他对话框中有中文的原因，这里暂且不去追究。
既然思考过程已经高下立判，那么两者的输出内容，我们也不妨也看一下：其中DeepSeek从文献组织、PPT准备、评审问题预测、增强全文逻辑、答辩技巧、模拟答辩几个方面给出了建议。而ChatGPT从理解全文逻辑、建立论文与PPT的映射关系、评审问题预测、练习答辩、准备好答辩心态、全文提炼几个方面给出建议。可见从输出的内容上看，两者差距并非像思考过程那样巨大。
以上，DeepSeek在思考过程上完爆ChatGPT，尤其是DeepSeek的思考过程非常容易启发我们的进一步思考，然而，在输出内容上，两者的差距并非很大。
